Royal Enfield Meteor 350 vs Triumph Speed 400 Tracker: price, power, features compared
The Meteor 350 is built for relaxed cruising while the Tracker 400 leans into flat-track styling and higher performance, at a higher price.
In the mid-size motorcycle segment, Royal Enfield's Meteor 350 and Triumph's Tracker 400 each carve out a distinct identity. The Meteor 350 is built for relaxed cruising, while the Tracker 400 gets flat-track styling and leans towards higher performance. According to the comparison, the Meteor 350 is priced from Rs 2 lakh, while the Tracker 400 starts at Rs 2.49 lakh.
On engine and power, the Meteor 350 uses a 349.34cc single-cylinder engine that produces 20.2 bhp and 27 Nm of torque, paired with a 5-speed gearbox. For the Tracker 400, the source cites a 349cc engine producing 39.45 bhp and 32 Nm of torque. According to Triumph's current official information, the Tracker 400 makes 40 PS and 32 Nm of torque.
The two bikes also differ in speed and riding experience. According to the figures in the comparison, the Meteor 350 has a top speed of 114 km/h, while the Tracker 400's top speed is put at up to 154 km/h. The Meteor 350 runs a 19-inch front wheel and 17-inch rear wheel, while the Tracker 400 has 17-inch wheels on both ends. The Meteor weighs 191 kg and has a seat height of 765 mm.
The two bikes also take different approaches on features. The Meteor 350 gets dual-channel ABS, a digital-analogue console, Tripper navigation, Bluetooth and USB charging. According to the company, its 349.34cc engine delivers 27 Nm of torque and it has a 15-litre fuel tank. The Tracker 400, meanwhile, gets traction control, ABS, LED lighting and an 805 mm seat height as part of a sportier setup.
Overall, the Meteor 350 emphasises comfortable cruising and a low-seat riding experience, while the Tracker 400 focuses on more power, speed and a flat-track-inspired look. When comparing the two, price alone is not the only factor; a rider's own riding needs matter just as much.
